The Writers Voice
The World's Favourite Literary Website

No Stars for the Eclipse

by

Robert Levin

One weathercaster called it a must-see light and shadow show by the Old Master Himself, but I canít say this last solar eclipse was worthy of there commendation. Not even total, and staged (in my location anyway) behind a thick cloud cover that served only to diffuse the vivid contrasts essential to any dramatic effect, the Old Master might have been faxing it in from deep space somewhere for all the incandescence it could claim. Quite frankly, as light shows go, I thought more interesting work was being done at the Electric Circus back in the '60s.

Now letís please not have any misunderstandings. Iím aware that Iím criticizing the performance of a venerable figure who, over the eons and in every conceivable form and category, has compiled an impressive oeuvre. If I have to confess that a lot of His stuff is not to my taste, that I find much of it heavy-handed or impenetrable (when, indeed, it is not distracted and slack), this doesnít mean Iíve failed to recognize the enormous contribution Heís made.

Iím thinking, of course, of the models some of His stunning manipulations of the more volatile natural elements provided for the Irwin Allen disaster films. And, to be sure, thereís His introduction of death itself which, brilliantly counterbalancing His earlier invention of genders and sex, forestalled the unwieldy prospect of twenty-thousand expansion teams in just the American League East (and, say, the 2006 playoffs extending well into the 2018 season). But thatís hardly been the limit of this remarkable innovationís reach and impact. In its absence, "Scream 2," which everyone agrees was even better than "Scream," would doubtless have languished in perpetual turnaround since filmgoers would have found the emotions of fear and panic depicted in the original much too weird and elusive for a sequel to ever be green lighted.

Whatís more, we can be reasonably certain that the popular denouement of the happy ending the product of an inevitable backlash would never have been developed.

So while itís often, for me, like feeling obliged to respect whatever that was that Marcel Marceau used to do, even as you knew that one more minute of it and your lungs were going to erupt with blood, Iím more than prepared to honor the Old Masterís achievements. Itís just that Iím not what youíd call a huge fan. What puts me off most is...well...itís His LORDLY attitude. I could forgive Him a lot yes, even those tedious revivals of His wind-and-water specials that take out half a state were He less disdainful of His audience, less willfully opaque and ambiguous. I know this mysterious ways thing is a cornerstone of His persona and I can understand His reluctance to give it up. But, bordering on the pathological, His aversion to making His meanings known is wearing a little thin, donít you think?

Iíll allow that, however disappointing it may be, itís ultimately of small consequence when He mounts a shoddy eclipse. But itís something else again when, for one especially egregious example, He leaves you to blow out all your circuits trying to figure just where Hannity and Colmes fit into the notion that if youíre on the planet itís for a reason.

Critique this work

Click on the book to leave a comment about this work

All Authors (hi-speed)    All Authors (dialup)    Children    Columnists    Contact    Drama    Fiction    Grammar    Guest Book    Home    Humour    Links    Narratives    Novels    Poems    Published Authors    Reviews    September 11    Short Stories    Teen Writings    Submission Guidelines

Be sure to have a look at our Discussion Forum today to see what's
happening on The World's Favourite Literary Website.